Monthly Archives: September 2023

Netflix Film Review: “Nimona” (2023) #NetflixReviews

Nimona’s zany shtick gets old quick

A disgraced knight, sworn to a code of honour, Ballister Boldheart, and a hyperactive shapeshifter, scorned by all, Nimona, team up to root out corruption at the centre of their kingdom.

Based on the graphic novel by ND Stevenson, and set in a futuristic mediaeval world, Nimona‘s bold science fantasy setting is refreshing in itself and is portrayed gorgeously: the animation, the character and set design, the direction, it’s all a joy to experience. The story zips along and the two main characters make for an entertaining double act, Ballister the straight man and Nimona the comedy man.

My use of the terms “straight” and “man” are a bit ironic, as the film is unashamedly LGBTI+. Ballister is gay, but that is never the focus of the story, and his lover is a dashing man named Ambrosius Goldenloin(!), and then there’s the casting of RuPaul of RuPaul’s Drag Race fame(!) All this plus the science fantasy setting helps to give an enjoyable and slightly campy vibe reminiscent of The Hunger Games or The Fifth Element. Nimona “her”self, the shapechanger, is apparently a cypher for writer ND Stevenson who is “non-binary, or something like it” — his words (he also uses any gendered pronoun).

But that leads us to the only bum note, and it’s a pretty big one: Nimona herself comes off as an ADHD, egoist who is hyped up on a speedball of caffeine, sugar and E numbers 102, 104, 122, 129 and 211. Basically, she is less charming than she is meant to be; her zany shtick gets old quick. Stevenson has also stated that he himself has ADHD and is bipolar; Nimona is basically Stevenson, or something like it. Setting aside LGBTI+ issues for a moment, any character this hyperactive, unstable and egoistic who does not have an arc where they try to fix that aspect of themselves — indeed, that aspect is lauded — is always going to make for an irritating and hard-to-sympathise-with character. Stevenson would have done better to divorce the non-binary narrative from his own ADHD and bipolar. There seems to be no real reflectiveness on this character flaw or even acknowledgement that this is indeed a character flaw; where is Nimona’s journey?

Nonetheless, this is a very entertaining film. Beautiful and quirky. It’s just a shame Nimona wasn’t slightly more likable or on a journey to overcome her character flaws.

4/5

© 2023 Bryan A. J. Parry

featured image from https://www.thepinknews.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/nimona-netflix-trans-animated-series-nd-stevenson.jpg

Is This Blog Allergic to 1 and 5 Stars?

perfect means perfect … awful means awful

Scrolling through this blog, you will notice that there are very few one star or five star reviews. But why? Is it because I intentionally only watch mediocre content, avoiding the peaks and valleys on purpose? Not at all, I love watching excellent films and awful films (although I may not yet have recovered from Ghost Story): excellent films because, well, they’re excellent, and awful films because, well, have you ever seen Mystery Science Theatre 3000?

The reason for the scarcity of one and five star reviews on this blog is simple. Unlike most people, especially on Amazon, who just give something a one or a five, the numbers mean something for me.

If a film is worthy of a five out of five perfect rating, it means it is pretty much a masterwork, virtually unimprovable, and probably a film of such importance that it will likely go down as one of the greatest movies of all time. That is what a perfect score means: perfect.

On the other hand, if you are getting a one, that means your product has nothing redeemable or good about it, or that the flaws are just simply overwhelming. That is what an awful score means: awful.

In reality, most things are either good, a bit poor, or really good. That is, 3 stars, 2 stars or 4 stars respectively. Very little in life in truly perfect, or truly awful. Just like how very few people are actually truly physically ugly or stunning; the overwhelming majority of people fit into the three to seven bracket.

And there we have it.

Weirdly, after binning the 5 stars system in favour of thumbs up / down, Netflix has recently introduced thumbs down, up, or double thumbs up. They’re well on their way back to a five star system, although perhaps by another name. I’m waiting for YouTube to follow suit.

© 2022-2023 Bryan A. J. Parry

Lord of the Rings: Rings of Power Season One Summary 100 Word Review #100WordReview #AmazonReview #LOTR #RingsofPower

poorly conceived, amateurish fanfic

Lord of the Rings: Rings of Power is the adaptation of the beloved works of J. R. R. Tolkien. One billion dollars well spent? No.

The acting is mostly poor. The dialogue is weak. The characters, for the most part, have no character. The plot arcs are either absent or sketched out, much like the characters. The motivations for characters are weak, unclear and / or non-existent. Things often just happen for no apparent reason, let alone because of the actions of the characters. And there is too much sloppy mystery box, cliffhanger nonsense that never leads anywhere.

Disappointing, poorly conceived, amateurish fanfic.

2/5

© 2022-2023 Bryan A. J. Parry

featured image from https://www.frezila.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/The-Lord-of-the-Rings-The-Rings-of-Power.jpg

Lord of the Rings: Rings of Power Season One Summary #AmazonReview #LOTR #RingsofPower

But being 2022, satire has overtaken reality

Lord of the Rings: Rings of Power is the adaptation of the beloved works of J. R. R. Tolkien. Let’s take a moment to think about what that actually means.

  • Tolkien’s books have sold over 200,000,000 copies,
  • been translated into dozens of languages,
  • the Peter Jackson film adaptation (2001-2003) won seventeen Oscars,
  • and grossed 3 billion,
  • and have been described as some of the greatest movies of all time,
  • the books themselves having been famously described by The Times thus: “The English-speaking world is divided into those who have read The Lord of the Rings and The Hobbit, and those who are going to read them”.

And Amazon has allegedly thrown 1 billion at the show, making it the most expensive of all time.

So no pressure then.

In 2016 I jokingly predicted a 2022 Lord of the Rings spoof series thus: “It’s time to go back down the Hobbit hole, but this time using all the appendices and flabby bits that Walsh, Boyens, and Jackson wisely left out of the films”. But being 2022, satire has overtaken reality. This series has indeed been carefully constructed from the appendices, footnotes and old bits of crumpled-up post-it notes.

When this series began, I was determined to not compare it to Tolkien’s original work, but to evaluate it on its own terms. Tolkien is a high bar to meet, and I feel that would be a handicap for any show. Indeed, that’s why I esteem the Jackson-Boyens-Walsh trilogy so much, as their work was not only excellent on its own terms but also on the terms laid down by Tolkien. Yet even by my looser desire to merely see a great show on its own terms, rather than a great show which does true justice to the beloved late Professor Tolkien’s works, and despite being someone who desperately wants this show to succeed, I just cannot give any episode more than a three out of five, and even then the threes are being scraped; indeed, I wonder how much my misplaced loyalty to the world of Middle-Earth is colouring my views and pushing me towards lenience to this show.

the overall vibe is an amateurish fanfic

This series has some good moments and some bad moments. But the overall vibe is an amateurish fanfic, but a fanfic not even set in Tolkien’s universe but rather set in a universe designed to nod to Tolkien’s. I’m not sure why or how a great company like Amazon with a great IP like this has managed to produce this substandard piece of work.

You can read my episode reviews, both long and short form, for the details. But the whole endeavour can be summed up fairly simply.

The acting is mostly poor. The dialogue is weak. The characters, for the most part, have no character. The plot arcs are either absent or sketched out, much like the characters. The motivations for characters are weak, unclear and / or non-existent. Things often just happen for no apparent reason, let alone because of the actions of the characters. And there is too much sloppy mystery box, cliffhanger nonsense that never leads anywhere.

The only way forward for Amazon is with (1) new showrunners and (2) an effective soft reboot for season two (remember how Troi and Picard in Star Trek: The Next Generation or Monica in Friends , to name but two examples, were fundamentally changed with no in-show commentary after season one?).

A quick look at my review straplines sums the whole thing up.

Carefully constructed from the appendices, footnotes and old bits of crumpled-up post-it notes

The Rings of Power: a cure for insomnia

Gimli 2 shows signs of being a genuinely interesting character

Constantly being reminded of British comedians probably isn’t what Amazon was hoping for with its casting decisions.

the writers … fulfil the age-old writing adage of “tell not show”…

…two thousand year old teenager Galadriel

… Legolas 2 … Gimli 2 … Aragorn 2 … Probably-Gandalf …

showing us Sauron so soon…. giving us the money shot from a flaccid chub.

I only spent half the time distracted [this episode] … hardly a ringing endorsement

a memberberry wrapped in a mystery box just for the sake of it

Bad lines badly delivered

makes no sense … no Keyser Söze moment here … one of the dumbest red herrings I have ever seen.

one of the dumbest fake reveals ever

Michael Palin lookalike Celebrimbor

Galdriel suspects … that Halbrand isn’t the king that, err, Galadriel made him out to be

This is a kind of “Darth Vader” situation, isn’t it?

the disappointing and fairly nonsensical ending that this poor first season deserves

All in all, a big let down.

2/5

© 2022-2023 Bryan A. J. Parry

featured image from https://www.frezila.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/The-Lord-of-the-Rings-The-Rings-of-Power.jpg

Netflix Film Review: Cargo (2017)

a cerebral human drama … unlike any other zombie flick you’ve ever seen

Stranded in the Australian Outback after a zombie apocalypse, Andy (Martin Freeman) tries to navigate the dangerous terrain to safeguard the life of his baby daughter. But he must battle not only zombies and other desperate humans who will do whatever it takes to survive, but also the enemies within which threaten to derail his bid to save his daughter’s life.

Cargo is a refreshing take on the zombie apocalypse delivered coolly by debutantes writer-director Yolanda Ramke and co-director and producer Ben Howling based on their own 2013 seven minute short film of the same name.

I don’t even want to call it a zombie film. Why? Because that will turn off the prospective audience for what is a cerebral human drama. It really is different to any zombie flick.

The beautiful but stark Australian landscape, believable performances from Martin Freeman and his on-screen wife Kay, Susie Porter, as well as Andy’s guide through the wilderness Thoomi, Simone Landers in her debut role, and the realistic-feeling portrayal of an aboriginal culture, make this film unlike any other zombie flick you’ve seen.

Ramke and Howling deserve extra credit for never going in for cheap scares or thrills, resisting the urge to Wolf Creek it up, and having the confidence to tell their epic story in their own way and at their own pace. It even made for a fresh change to see a return to the shambling, disco-ordinated zombies of yore rather than the Usain Bolts we’ve come used to after 28 Days Later.

A gem that’s well worth it’s 88% Fresh rating on Rotten Tomatoes. An artistic (but not artsy or pretentious), visually compelling, refreshing take on the zombie genre.

4/5

© 2020, 2023 Bryan A. J. Parry

featured image from https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BZTczZWEyOTktODNmMC00NDgzLTk3NTktYjllN2Y4MWMxOGViXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTMxODk2OTU@._V1_UY1200_CR90,0,630,1200_AL_.jpg

Lord of the Rings: The Rings of Power S1E8 150 Word Review “Alloyed” #AmazonReview #LOTR #RingsofPower #150WordReview

makes no sense … no Keyser Söze moment here … one of the dumbest red herrings I have ever seen.

REVIEW CONTAINS PLOT SPOILERS

The season finale of Lord of the Rings: Rings of Power finally reveals the identity of Sauron, we see the forging of the eponymous rings, and we (probably) find out who the Harfoots’ Stranger friend is. All great stuff. The problem? The episode is total nonsense.

Sauron’s initial fake identity reveal is poor. No Keyser Söze moment; rather, one of the dumbest, most see-through red herrings I have ever seen.

The idiocy continues. The greatest smith in history, Michael Palin lookalike Celebrimbor, doesn’t know about alloying metals(!) I, a lowly English teacher, have this knowledge.

The show ends on two big reveals. Probably-Gandalf is… probably Gandalf. And Halbrand is… hang on a sec. Halbrand. Hal Brand. Hal. Hell. Brand. Like fire. Literally, “Hell Fire.” This is a kind of “Darth Vader” situation, isn’t it? Yes, Halbrand is Sauron. Dumb.

Bad plotting, a lack of characterisation, poor acting, shoddy dialogue, stuff that just doesn’t make sense. The disappointing and fairly nonsensical ending that this poor first season deserves.

2/5

© 2022-2023 Bryan A. J. Parry

featured image from https://static1.cbrimages.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/sauron-and-ruler-ring-from-lord-of-the-rings.jpg